The omnitruncated E8 polyzetton, also known as the
Terminology note: the dimension-specific supervolume terms here go volume ->
Calculating the supervolume of any polytope is quite simple, and uses very simple geometry. Specifically, the supervolume of a shape is simply the sum of supervolumes of the pyramids of the facets with the apex at the center of the polytope. Or, in more mathematical notation, V = ΣIfAfn−1, with V being the total supervolume, If the inradius of a facet, Af the superarea of a facet and n the dimension of the polytope.
Getting the superarea of the facets simply requires doing the same process, however getting the inradius of the facets requires the circumradius of the facet and of the full polytope, with If = √R2-rf2, with R being the polytope's circumradius and rf the facet's circumradius. Getting the circumradius of any Wythoffian polytope is quite complicated and involves taking the inverse of its Coxeter diagram's Dynkin matrix.[2] This is easy to do with code and has been calculated for all relevant polytopes here, so let's move on.
The zetta of the E8 omnitruncate can be determined using its Coxeter diagram, by removing singular nodes and their edges. This procedure for getting the facets is the same for any other polytope built using such diagrams. This gives the following eight types of zetta:
| Count | Symmetry | Coxeter diagram | Name |
|---|---|---|---|
| 240 | E7 | x3x3x3x3x3x . *c3x | Omnitruncated E7 polyexon |
| 2160 | D7 | . x3x3x3x3x3x *c3x | Great pentellated hecatonicosaexon |
| 6720 | E6×A1 | x3x3x3x3x . x *c3x | Omnitruncated E6 polypetal prism |
| 17280 | A7 | x3x3x3x3x3x3x . | Great petihexadecaexon |
| 60480 | D5×A2 | x3x3x3x . x3x *c3x | Hexagonal-great runcinated triacontaditeral duoprism |
| 69120 | A6×A1 | x . x3x3x3x3x *c3x | Great teritetradecapetal prism |
| 241920 | A4×A3 | x3x3x . x3x3x *c3x | Truncated octahedral-great prismatodecachoral duoprism |
| 483840 | A4×A2×A1 | x3x . x3x3x3x *c3x | Hexagonal-great prismatodecachoral duoprismatic prism |
I first calculated its octolume semi-manually with a PARI/GP script (found here: E8.gp), which had a function that calculated the supervolume of a polytope using the polytope's Dynkin matrix and symmetry order along with the symmetry components' supervolume, circumradius and symmetry order. I call it "semi-manual" as it did require me to input all the polytope's compontents' properties individually. Its findings are listed below. As per standard, all of these were calculated with unit edge length.
The formula for calculating the supervolume of omnitruncated simplices was already known, with ,[3] and was used to test if the numbers given by the script were accurate.
| Name | Symmetry | Supervolume |
|---|---|---|
| Truncated octahedron | A3 | 8√2 ≈ 11.313708 |
| Great prismatodecachoron | A4 | 1254√5 ≈ 69.877124 |
| Great cellidodecateron | A5 | 324√3 ≈ 561.184462 |
| Great teritetradecapeton | A6 | 168078√7 ≈ 5558.392786 |
| Great petihexadecaexon | A7 | 65536 |
| Great exioctadecazetton | A8 | 1434890716 = 896806.6875 |
| Great zetticosayotton | A9 | 6250000√5 ≈ 13975424.859374 |
| Great yotticosidironnon | A10 | 235794769132√11 ≈ 244388367.697871 |
The next omnitruncated simplex to have rational supervolume is the 17-simplex, with a septendecolume of 1423119505038213888. This follows sequence A155946 in the OEIS.
This category is equivalent to the subomnitruncated orthoplices. While the Polytope Wiki lists the volumes of these up to 6D, Klitzing's site only lists it for the 4D case.
| Name | Symmetry | Supervolume |
|---|---|---|
| Truncated icositetrachoron | D4 | 59 |
| Great runcinated triacontaditeron | D5 | 1968√2 ≈ 2783.172291 |
| Great stericated hexecontatetrapeton | D6 | 58835 |
| Great pentellated hecatonicosoctaexon | D7 | 1033896√2 ≈ 1462149.745283 |
| Great hexicated diacosipentecontahexazetton | D8 | 41822865 |
| Great heptellated pentacosidodecayotton | D9 | 957557536√2 ≈ 1354190854.163763 |
| Great octicated chiliaicositetraronnon | D10 | 48980938473 |
There is no known closed formula for these, although I do believe there probably is one.
This is the moment you have all been waiting for.[dubious—discuss] They were all calculated on 29 September 2025 at around 00:08:20 UTC, when I was paying attention to the clock specifically to mention that fact. And yes, I did wait nine days before publishing this for that really nice release date of 8 October.
| Name | Symmetry | Supervolume |
|---|---|---|
| Omnitruncated E6 polypeton | E6 | 111942√3 ≈ 193889.231501 |
| Omnitruncated E7 polyexon | E7 | 31056795 |
| Omnitruncated E8 polyzetton | E8 | 27386950905 |
Out of curiosity from having mentioned the latter's circumradius 8-ball octolume at the start, I thought of making a measure for "sphericity", defined as the ratio of a polytope's true supervolume to its circumradius supervolume, root its dimension (). Here are the sphericity values, as well as "smoothness" (= 11 − sphericity) for some other omnitruncates:
| Name | Symmetry | Sphericity | Smoothness |
|---|---|---|---|
| Truncated octahedron | A3 | 0.880783 | 8.388046 |
| Great rhombicuboctahedron | B3 | 0.928935 | 14.071570 |
| Great rhombicosidodecahedron | H3 | 0.964789 | 28.400523 |
| Great prismatodecachoron | A4 | 0.867523 | 7.548516 |
| Great disprismatotesseractihexadecachoron | B4 | 0.916658 | 11.998775 |
| Great prismatotessaracontoctachoron | F4 | 0.956230 | 22.846571 |
| Great disprismatohexacosihecatonicosachoron | H4 | 0.986144 | 72.170395 |
| Omnitruncated E6 polypeton | E6 | 0.926496 | 13.604716 |
| Omnitruncated E7 polyexon | E7 | 0.943000 | 17.543795 |
| Omnitruncated E8 polyzetton | E8 | 0.961531 | 25.995394 |
This section will now cover a more general method of calculation for any polytope with a respective Dynkin matrix. The code above uses this same method, but with some values input manually.
For a Dynkin matrix , its supervolume can be calculated through this equation, recursing over all elements:
Here, is the facet obtained from removing row and column of , corresponding to the facet obtained from removing node of the Coxeter diagram, is the circumradius of the polytope represented by , equal to , and is the order of the Coxeter group corresponding to . This correspondence only considers the values, with the Coxeter diagram edges being (or, inversely, ).
Getting the order of a Coxeter group from a Dynkin matrix is tricky. For convex cases above 2D, it is possible to get the group order by dividing the total hypersphere superarea by the superarea of a Schwarz simplex with the edge lengths being all values of . For non-convex cases, it often results in non-integer order and dense polytopes, also explored in Failed Archimedeans.
For a Dynkin matrix . The circumradius is simply , with the perimeter (1-volume) being . The order is also always 2. This is the trivial/base case.
For a Dynkin matrix , corresponding to the symmetry of the -gon, the circumradius becomes and the order becomes . The final area formula then becomes:
For polyhedra, the Dynkin matrix becomes . Calculations get more complicated in 3D with respect how the order and circumradius are calculated. Through the property that, for convex polyhedra, the sum of angular defects of vertices is equal to 4π, it is possible to obtain the order by taking the angular defect of the omnitruncate (summing the internal angles of the types of faces that make up the omnitruncate, and taking the reciprocal of the difference of that with 2π), resulting in , with , which can be slightly reduced to with . In order to make calculating the circumradius easier, we'll first calculate , which, again, :
The final volume formula then becomes:
For polychora, the Dynkin matrix becomes . Things become even more complex in this stage, for the same reasons as the 3D case: the equation for both the circumradius and order become extremely complicated. It's moreso for the order, which requires calculation of the volume of a tetrahedron on a glome (3-sphere), which is way more intricate and makes use of functions like dilogarithms.[4] The circumradius is not as complicated, but attempting to compute it in PARI/GP as I had done for previous circumradius calculations took way too long. Safe to say, I would not be rewriting that long of an equation in LaTeX to display it here. At this point, it should just be easier to calculate with the main supervolume equation.